Life Insurance Lawyer Connecticut
Our Connecticut life insurance lawyers are here to help.
If the policy includes such an exclusion, and the death occurred during the exclusion period, it may be difficult to dispute the claim denial. However, if the death occurred outside of the exclusion period or there is evidence to suggest that the death was not the result of a deliberate act, it may be possible to challenge the claim denial.
In any case, it is important to carefully review the terms of the policy and seek legal advice if necessary to determine the best course of action for disputing the claim denial.
Life Insurance Beneficiary Rules and Disputes Connecticut
2023-2024 Life Insurance Claims in Connecticut Recently Settled
- Mass shooting Connecticut denied life claim won $105,000.00
- AIG Life alleged misrepresentation $40,000.00
- Atlantic American breast cancer denial $103,000.00
- TIAA coronavirus denial we resolved $67,000.00
- Country Financial smoking in records $13,000.00
- Veterans contested by siblings resolved $59,000.00
- Boston Mutual COVID-19 denial $320,000.00
- Bank of America autoerotic asphyxiation death $102,000.00
- Southern Farm Bureau medical records $30,000.00
- Bright house Financial exclusion $91,300.00
- MassMutual coronavirus exclusion $300,000.00
- Denial of SGLI claim beneficiary change $403,500.00
- TIAA beneficiary dispute we won$165,000.00
- Accidental Death & Dismemberment $500,000.00
- North American Life heroin denial $25,000.00
- Columbian Mutual Life prescription drug $102,000.00
- Denial of FEGLI claim resolved $143,600.00
- Effortless six month delay resolved $25,000.00
- Stonebridge Life denial of benefits $250,000.00
- Union National denial for misrepresentation $252,800.00
- Stamford court orders divorce settlement $2,000,000.00
- Bad faith life insurance denial of benefits $685,000.00
- Forethought robbery felony exclusion $137,000.00
- Denied FEGLI claim dispute we resolved $285,000.00
- Security Life denial divorce spouse ex-spouse $309,200.00
- Avon suspicious circumstances death $713,000.00
- Connecticut denied life insurance claim $2,048,000.00
- Waterbury grace period issue overcome $750,000.00
- Denied SGLI claim that we resolved $402,400.00
- Danbury dangerous activity exclusion won $932,000.00
- Branford invalid beneficiary designation $504,000.00
- Divorce and orders from the judge dispute $390,000.00
- Denied AD&D claim heart attack dispute $739,000.00
- Monarch Life denied due to medical records $277,000.00
- Bridgeport foreign death problem we won $1,000,000.00
- Protective Life alcohol exclusion denial $405,500.00
- Midland Life autoerotic asphyxiation denial $104,150.00
- American Equity denied felony exclusion $152,000.00
- The Hartford interpleader lawsuit plaintiff $303,750.00
- Mutual Benefit Life long delay of benefits $293,100.00
- Denied life insurance claim Connecticut $653,650.00
- Stonebridge wrong age on the application $208,370.00
- Colonial Penn beneficiary dispute $455,000.00
- American Life contestable period delay $101,300.00
- Hartford suspicious circumstances death $892,000.00
- Norwalk no coverage at the time of death $677,000.00
- Allianz foreign death denial resolved $340,000.00
- New Haven mistake on the application $750,000.00
- Pan American self-inflicted injury $278,200.00
Interpleader Lawyer Connecticut
Connecticut Life Insurance Law
Was death by mosquito an accidental death?
Life insurance companies would argue “no”
Life insurance companies do not stay in business by indiscriminately paying every claim that is submitted to them. This is especially true when it comes to paying claims stemming from Accidental Death & Dismemberment ("AD&D”) riders. That is because AD&D riders typically increase the required payout amount substantially.
In some instances, an AD&D rider will double the standard policy coverage. In other cases, such as one that arose in the State of Texas recently, the AD&D rider will pay off the policyholder’s mortgage if he or she dies while owing money on their principal residence.
The case is an interesting one because it shows the lengths an insurance company will go to in an effort to deny valid claims. As attorneys who specialize in contesting such denials, we’re keenly aware of the tricks life insurance companies play. We have made it our sole mission in life to overcome such deceit and to help our clients reap the benefits their deceased loved ones intended for them.
One mosquito was all it took
The case at issue involved a 68 year-old Texas man named Jack. He and his wife, Joni, were enjoying an outdoor barbeque when Jack got bit by a mosquito. Given that mosquito bites are a regular occurrence in Texas, Jack didn’t think much of it.
Within a couple of days, however, Jack wasn’t feeling well at all. He had a high fever, chills, and was becoming increasingly disoriented. Worried, Joni took him to the hospital. Tests revealed that Jack had contracted West Nile Virus from the mosquito bite and he was immediately placed in intensive care.
Despite the best efforts of the doctors and nurses, Jack suffered organ failure and died within just 48 hours of being admitted. Jack’s official cause of death was listed as “natural causes,” but his autopsy report also noted that Jack suffered from obesity, diabetes, and early-stage heart disease.
Jack had been the sole breadwinner in his household and his death left Joni with three kids to raise and a mortgage to pay on a home they had acquired less than a month prior to the barbeque. Joni was grateful that Jack had insisted they take out a life insurance policy on him – and was especially grateful they had paid for the AD&D rider that would pay off the couple’s mortgage.
Nearly three weeks after Jack died, Joni made a claim against the policy. In her claim forms, she asserted that Jack’s death from a mosquito bite was “accidental,” thus triggering coverage under the AD&D rider. Joni didn’t anticipate any problems with the claim as it seemed like a clear case for full coverage.
A shocking life insurance denial letter
Notwithstanding Joni’s confidence, one month later a denial letter arrived in the mail. In it, Jack’s life insurance company claimed that Jack had died as a result of his obesity, diabetes, and heart disease, and not as the result of any accident. The insurer also claimed that despite Jack’s diagnosis of West Nile Virus, the medical doctors had been unable to locate the precise location of the infected bite. Without such evidence, they claimed they could not conclude a mosquito bite had anything at all to do with Jack’s death.
While the insurance company did pay the regular death benefit provided for in Jack’s base policy, it outright denied paying off Joni’s mortgage under the AD&D rider. Many people would have given up and simply accepted the life insurance company’s denial but something didn’t sit right with Joni. She asked around and was eventually connected with a life insurance attorney
Together, the attorney and Joni poured through all of the relevant insurance documents and medical records. The attorney recommended to Joni that she take the life insurance company to court. She took his advice and, in retrospect, is extremely glad she did.
No death without the mosquito
Within the case, Joni’s attorney argued that this was a clear-cut case of “accidental death,” that should have triggered a payout under Jack’s AD&D rider. While the attorney truthfully acknowledged that Jack did suffer from obesity, diabetes, and heart disease, he also presented medical evidence that none of those conditions were an immediate threat to Jack’s life. Rather, it was solely the West Nile Virus contracted from a mosquito that caused Jack to die at the precise time that he did.
As for the life insurer’s argument that the medical records failed to show evidence of a mosquito bite, the attorney presented evidence illustrating that such a bite is believed to be the only way a human can contract West Nile Virus. Since Jack had that disease, he argued, it goes without saying that he must have been bitten.
Ultimately, the case was fought all the way up to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. That court agreed with Joni’s attorney’s arguments completely. They ruled that life insurance company was obligated to pay Joni the full benefit required under the AD&D rider. That meant the insurer had to pay the amount that was owing on Joni’s mortgage at the time of Jack’s death. For Joni, that meant the difference between losing her home and being able to keep it as a safe place to raise her three children.
Unfortunately, Joni’s case is not unusual. In fact, our life insurance attorneys see these sort of tactics every day. We know the insurance company is hoping beneficiaries like Joni will be too grief-stricken to fight their wrongful denials. That is one of the reasons it is so important to get a specialized attorney in times like these. Grief can keep us from doing things we desperately need to do – including fighting for ourselves.
Life Insurance Contestability Period Connecticut
New Haven life insurance lawyer
Bridgeport CT life insurance lawyer
Hartford life insurance lawyer
Stamford life insurance lawyer
Waterbury life insurance lawyer
If you or someone you know has recently had a life insurance claim denied, please don’t hesitate to contact our firm. This is what we do every day. We’re here to help.