An important financial tool used by Americans to protect the welfare of their families when they pass away is life insurance. As a result, the proceeds from these policies can be as high as a thousand to million dollars. This frequently serves as a motivator for individuals to murder the insured in order to receive the money more quickly. Beneficiaries, loved ones, or even the insured themselves could hatch a scheme to assassinate them.
Normally, if it has been at least two years from the policy's effective date, murder is covered, regardless of whether it is classified as a homicide or manslaughter. There are only a handful of situations in which life insurance does not provide coverage for murder, and in most cases, the beneficiary can make a claim and collect the policy benefit as long as they were not complicit in the murder scheme. Otherwise, they are not eligible for the death benefit under the slayer law, if the police inquiry reveals that they took part in the act.
The slayer rule restricts a life insurance payout to someone who committed the murder of the insured or was intimately involved in it. The insurance company in this instance distributes the payout to the insured's estate or conditional beneficiaries.
Life insurance companies have particular rights if the insured is murdered during the first two years of the policy, generally known as the contestability period. They are permitted to conduct their own inquiry into the murder. In order to ascertain the precise cause of death, they will reevaluate the documents to weed out any instances of material misrepresentation. They may also request toxicology results, autopsy reports, and medical records. The claim will be postponed until they complete their investigation or the police exonerate the beneficiary.
Generally speaking, claims involving murder are not covered by life insurance for the following reasons:
The Beneficiary Is Responsible for the Insured's Murder
The insurance company will hold off on paying the claim if the beneficiary is under suspicion of killing the insured until they are exonerated by the authorities. Even if the beneficiary is found not guilty, the insurance might still sue them in civil court if they believe there is solid evidence linking them to the crime.
The civil court requires less proof to convict someone than the criminal court does. This indicates that the beneficiary may still be held accountable for the insured's death and have the death benefit revoked.
The Insured was Killed While Taking Part in Illegal Activity.
If the insurer was killed while engaging in risky behavior, such as drunk driving, life insurance companies may refuse to pay the claim. They will also decline to pay if the insured engaged in criminal conduct, such as distributing narcotics, breaking and entering, robbery, or other gang activity.
Insureds and/or their families sometimes plan their own demise in order to access policy proceeds sooner. insurance fraud. The insurance company will hold off on paying the claim if they believe the insured and/or their beneficiaries acted wrongfully.
The insurer may conduct its own investigation and work with the authorities to ascertain whether the murder was premeditated. For instance, the insurer will decline to distribute the proceeds if the investigation's findings reveal that the insured and/or their beneficiaries planned the murder and hired a killer. The insurer will terminate the coverage if the insured survives the murder attempt they had planned.
Our life insurance lawyers fight all claims and win.