Life Insurance Lawyer South Carolina

Our South Carolina life insurance lawyers are here to help.

Explain group life insurance conversion rights upon termination of employment
Group life insurance conversion rights are the rights granted to employees who are leaving a job that offers group life insurance coverage to convert that coverage into an individual life insurance policy.

When an employee leaves a job that provided group life insurance coverage, the coverage typically ends. However, the employee may have the option to convert that coverage into an individual life insurance policy without having to undergo a medical exam or answer any health-related questions.

This conversion privilege is often subject to certain conditions, such as a time limit for converting the coverage and the ability to choose from a limited number of policy options.

The cost of the individual policy is generally based on the employee's age and health status at the time of conversion, and may be higher than the cost of the group coverage. However, the conversion privilege allows the employee to maintain life insurance coverage after leaving the job, which may be particularly important if the employee has health issues that make it difficult to obtain individual life insurance coverage on the open market.

It's important to note that the conversion privilege is only available for a limited time after the employee leaves the job, typically 30 to 60 days. If the employee misses the deadline to convert the coverage, they may not have another opportunity to obtain life insurance coverage at the same level of benefits without undergoing a medical exam or answering health-related questions.

If you are leaving a job that provides group life insurance coverage and you are interested in converting that coverage into an individual policy, you should contact the human resources department or the insurance carrier to obtain the necessary forms and information about the conversion process.

Call us at 800-330-2274 for a free consultation.

Life Insurance Beneficiary Rules and Disputes South Carolina

2023-2024 Life Insurance Claims in South Carolina Recently Settled

  • Erie Life COVID-19 death denied $109,000.00
  • Accidental Death & Dismemberment $528,000.00
  • Liberty National coronavirus death $111,000.00
  • SGLI denial change of beneficiary $40,000.00
  • All American power of attorney change $12,000.00
  • Industrial Life material misrepresentation $23,000.00
  • Security Plan Life suicide exclusion $101,900.00
  • AVMA Life interpleader lawsuit $156,000.00
  • Royal Neighbors health record issue $109,000.00
  • American Retirement Life illness exclusion $13,000.00
  • AD&D claim denial due to intoxication $940,000.00
  • Loyal American Life oxycontin denial $77,000.00
  • Chase Life insurable interest issue $208,000.00
  • Mass shooting South Carolina denied claim $112,000.00
  • Stonebridge interpleader lawsuit won $301,900.00
  • Genworth misstatement of age on application $218,000.00
  • Primerica suicide and/or self-inflicted injury $315,000.00
  • South Carolina denied life insurance claim $3,100,000.00
  • HSBC application material misrepresentation $416,000.00
  • Metropolitan policy not in force allegedly $105,000.00
  • ERISA appeal written that was successful $189,000.00
  • Denied life insurance claim South Carolina $2,2000,000.00
  • Prudential drunk driving death alcohol exclusion $417,000.00
  • SGLI issue change of beneficiary form $400,000.00
  • South Carolina divorce and life insurance $550,000.00
  • FEGLI appeal resolved within two weeks $168,000.00
  • Bankers illegal activity or dangerous activity $107,000.00
  • South Caroline bad faith life insurance claim $790,000.00
  • Mass Mutual foreign death claim resolved $431,000.00
  • Allstate autoerotic asphyxiation death $317,300.00

Interpleader Lawyer South Carolina

South Carolina Life Insurance Law

If you’ve ever shopped around for a life insurance policy, you’ve undoubtedly been offered an extra coverage package known as the “Accidental Death & Dismemberment Rider” (the “AD&D rider”). AD&D riders seem like a heck of a deal when you’re signing up for life insurance because typically, they pay out two to three times the standard policy amount if the policyholder dies in an accident. So, for example, if you have a $1,000,000 policy and add an AD&D rider, your beneficiaries might get an extra $3,000,000 if your death was the result of an accident. Sounds like a good deal, right?

It can be, but when you’re signing up for these riders, the insurance companies don’t tell you some very critical information: (1) your premiums will increase substantially if you add an AD&D rider; (2) very few people with life insurance actually die from accidents; and (3) even if you do die as the result of an accident, the insurance company has built in dozens of policy exclusions that relieve them from having to make the extra AD&D payout.

By way of example, many AD&D riders exclude coverage if the policyholder dies while committing a crime. Insurers have been known to invoke this exclusion if a policyholder dies in an automobile accident while exceeding the legal speed limit. Another popular exclusion kicks in if the policyholder dies while engaged in intentionally dangerous conduct. What they don’t tell you is that they are the ones who decide whether the insured’s conduct was intentional and/or dangerous – regardless of what police reports or autopsy reports say.

As attorneys who specialize in the wrongful denial of life insurance claims, we fight over denied claims under AD&D riders all the time. In fact, any time a client calls with a denied AD&D claim, we know we’re in for a fight. Simply put, insurance companies don’t like to pay out exorbitant AD&D benefits. Consequently, they’ll concoct all sorts of bogus justifications for denying these claims.

This article explains just such a case. Fortunately, the family at issue here had the wherewithal to call an attorney practicing life insurance law. That decision seems to have been a lifesaver for them.

A tragic death for grandma

The case principally involves an elderly woman named Agnes. Agnes had worked for a local state hospital for most of her adult life. As part of her benefits package, she received a life insurance policy with a death payout worth $150,000. It also included an AD&D rider worth $450,000. After Agnes retired, she decided to keep up the policy by paying her own premiums, which she did faithfully for over 10 years. Agnes named her only daughter, Mary Jo, as her sole beneficiary.

Anyone who knew Agnes knew that she was exceptionally vital for a woman of 82 years of age. She still drove herself everywhere, lived on her own, laughed frequently, took care of several farm animals, and entertained guests at least once a week. She was the kind of woman every other woman aspires to be.

On March 26, Agnes was scheduled to have several friends over for a dinner party and a game of Scrabble. Typically, Agnes would call her guests to confirm their attendance exactly 48 hours prior to the party. On this occasion, she didn’t make any calls. Given that her guests were all frequent visitors, however, everyone assumed Agnes finally believed they would all show up and that she decided to stop bothering with the confirmation phone call.

All the guests showed up on March 26 at 7pm sharp, just as Agnes required. What they found though, shocked their senses. Agnes was face down on the kitchen floor, lifeless. She had clearly been there for some time. Her friends called the police immediately and an investigation ensued.

The autopsy report revealed that Agnes had likely fallen and broken her hip and pelvis in several places. Unable to get up or reach the phone, she laid on the kitchen floor for approximately five days before she finally passed away from dehydration and pneumonia that settled into her lungs.

A mind-blowing claim denial

Like everyone who knew her mother, Mary Jo was shocked and saddened by her mother’s death. Nonetheless, Agnes had made sure Mary Jo knew about the life insurance policy and Mary Jo quickly made a claim for benefits under the policy and the AD&D rider. Given the circumstances of her mother’s death, Mary Jo never thought for a second that the claim would be denied.

Mary Jo was partly right. The life insurance company quickly offered to pay the principal $150,000 benefit under the policy. As for the AD&D rider, however, the insurer denied the claim. Their reasoning was that Agnes died as a result of pneumonia and dehydration and not as the result of an accidental fall.

Luckily, Mary Jo had a friend who referred her to an attorney specializing in the wrongful denial of life insurance claims. He could see right away that the denial of the AD&D claim was completely bogus. He took the insurance company to court and presented evidence at trial that Agnes never would have become dehydrated or suffered pneumonia if she hadn’t been completely incapacitated by her accidental fall.

The court agreed with that analysis and awarded Mary Jo the full policy benefit, including the AD&D payout, with interest. In open court, the judge chastised the insurance company for its deceitful attempt to deny that Agnes’ death was the result of an accident.

Life Insurance Contestability Period South Carolina

Columbia SC life insurance lawyer

Charleston SC life insurance lawyer

Mount Pleasant SC life insurance lawyer

Rock Hill SC life insurance lawyer

Greenville SC life insurance lawyer

Unfortunately, we see claim denials like this regularly. We also successfully contest such claims all the time. If you or a loved one have had a life insurance claim denied on any basis that makes you feel uneasy, please contact our office today. We’re happy to provide you with a free consultation and let you know if you have a viable claim against the insurance company. Call us. We’re here to help.