$
Our life insurance law firm recently recovered $215,000 after State Farm denied a life insurance claim based on alleged misrepresentation in the policy application. Like many misrepresentation denials, State Farm claimed that the insured failed to disclose information it later argued was material to underwriting. After a thorough legal review and pressure based on underwriting standards and governing law, the insurer reversed its position and paid the full death benefit.
This case highlights how misrepresentation denials are frequently overstated, legally unsupported, and vulnerable to challenge when examined closely.
What Insurers Mean by “Misrepresentation”
Misrepresentation occurs when an insurance company claims that an applicant provided false, incomplete, or misleading information that allegedly influenced its decision to issue a policy or determine pricing. Life insurance applications are extensive and often confusing, requiring disclosure of medical history, prescription use, lifestyle habits, finances, and sometimes family health history.
After a death, insurers frequently re review the application line by line, comparing answers against medical records, pharmacy databases, and third party data. Any discrepancy, no matter how minor, may be labeled a misrepresentation if the insurer believes it can be used to avoid paying the claim.
In practice, insurers often stretch this concept far beyond what the law allows.
Common Misrepresentation Allegations Used to Deny Claims
In misrepresentation based denials, insurers typically focus on a few recurring areas:
Medical history disclosures are the most common target. Insurers often claim the insured failed to disclose a prior diagnosis, test, symptom, or doctor visit, even when the condition was resolved, insignificant, or unknown to the insured at the time.
Lifestyle factors are another frequent focus. Smoking history, alcohol use, prescription medication, or recreational activities may be challenged, even when questions were vague or poorly defined on the application.
Financial disclosures are increasingly used as grounds for denial. Overstated income, understated debt, or omitted financial events such as bankruptcy are often cited in high value policy disputes.
Family medical history is sometimes raised as an issue, particularly in cases involving cancer or cardiovascular deaths, even though applicants often answer these questions based on limited knowledge.
In the State Farm case, the insurer relied on an alleged omission that it claimed would have changed underwriting. That claim did not hold up under scrutiny.
The Contestability Period and Why It Matters
Most life insurance policies include a two year contestability period. During this time, insurers are permitted to investigate the application and attempt to rescind the policy if they believe a material misstatement was made.
This window is where most misrepresentation denials occur. If the insured dies within the contestability period, insurers almost always conduct an aggressive post claim investigation. Outside that period, the insurer must usually prove intentional fraud, which is a much higher legal burden.
Importantly, being within the contestability period does not give the insurer automatic authority to deny a claim. The insurer must still prove that the alleged misrepresentation was material and that it actually affected underwriting.
Why Many Misrepresentation Denials Are Legally Weak
Misrepresentation denials frequently fail for several reasons.
First, many application questions are vague, ambiguous, or subjective. Courts routinely rule that unclear questions cannot support rescission.
Second, insurers often cannot prove materiality. Underwriting manuals frequently show that the omitted information would not have changed issuance or pricing.
Third, insurers often waive their right to rescind by failing to conduct reasonable underwriting at the time the policy was issued. Accepting premiums while failing to investigate readily available information weakens the denial.
Fourth, insurers often assume intent where none existed. Honest mistakes, forgotten doctor visits, or misunderstood questions do not automatically amount to misrepresentation.
In the $215,000 State Farm matter, internal underwriting guidelines contradicted the insurer’s denial position, making continued refusal to pay indefensible.
How Misrepresentation Denials Impact Beneficiaries
When a life insurance claim is denied for misrepresentation, beneficiaries are often blindsided. They typically had no role in completing the application and no knowledge of what information the insurer now claims was missing or incorrect.
The financial impact can be severe. Families lose expected funds needed for mortgages, education, medical bills, and long term stability. At the same time, insurers often pressure beneficiaries to accept premium refunds, implying that no further recovery is possible.
That pressure is often misplaced.
How We Challenged the State Farm Denial
In this case, we obtained the full application file, underwriting materials, and internal guidelines used by State Farm at the time the policy was issued. The evidence demonstrated that the alleged misrepresentation would not have changed the underwriting outcome.
We also identified failures in the insurer’s underwriting process that undermined its ability to rely on post claim investigation. Once confronted with this evidence, State Farm agreed to resolve the claim rather than risk litigation exposure.
The beneficiary received the full $215,000 death benefit.
Our Approach to Misrepresentation Based Life Insurance Denials
Our firm routinely handles misrepresentation denials involving State Farm and other major insurers. These cases require careful analysis of application language, underwriting standards, medical records, and insurer conduct.
We do not accept insurer explanations at face value. Instead, we examine whether the denial meets legal requirements and whether the insurer overreached in its attempt to avoid payment.
We handle these disputes nationwide, including individual policies, employer sponsored group life insurance governed by ERISA, and federal programs such as FEGLI and SGLI. Many misrepresentation denials collapse once challenged properly.
Misrepresentation Does Not Automatically Void Coverage
A life insurance policy cannot be rescinded simply because an insurer later finds an inconsistency. The law requires proof of materiality, proper underwriting reliance, and in many cases intent.
The State Farm settlement demonstrates a broader truth. Many misrepresentation denials are not final, and insurers often reverse course when forced to justify their position under legal scrutiny.
If a life insurance claim has been denied based on alleged misrepresentation, prompt legal review is critical. These cases are frequently recoverable when challenged effectively.