Top

Denied 100 Thousand AARP Life Insurance Claim Won

Our firm secured a $100,000 payout on an AARP life insurance policy after the insurer initially delayed and attempted to sidestep payment under an accelerated death benefit rider. The insured had been diagnosed with a late-stage illness and met all the qualifications for the rider but the insurer refused to pay, claiming the documentation was insufficient and the condition didn’t meet their interpretation of “terminal.” The family turned to us for help, and we pushed back hard. After challenging the narrow interpretation of the policy and presenting clear medical evidence, we compelled AARP’s insurer to pay the full benefit.

This case reflects a growing problem in life insurance claims: insurers promoting accelerated death benefit riders as a lifeline, then hiding behind unclear policy language to avoid paying when families need that lifeline most. If you have Oregon life insurance claim issues call us.

What Insurers Don’t Tell You About Accelerated Death Benefit Riders

Accelerated death benefits sound straightforward if you’re diagnosed with a terminal illness or need long-term care, you can access part of your policy’s value before death. But in reality, these riders are laced with restrictive definitions, burdensome documentation requirements, and hidden exclusions that insurers often use to delay or deny payouts.

In the AARP case, the policyholder’s diagnosis involved a degenerative condition that impaired their ability to perform daily tasks. The treating physicians provided clear documentation of the progressive decline and poor prognosis. But the insurer claimed the condition didn’t fit its definition of “terminal” despite policy language that didn’t clearly define the term. After we pointed out the ambiguity and highlighted case law requiring such language to be interpreted in favor of the insured, the company reversed course and issued full payment.

Real Examples of Denied Accelerated Benefit Claims

We’ve handled numerous cases where life insurers wrongly denied or delayed accelerated benefits. Here are just a few:

  • $150,000 delay over Alzheimer’s diagnosis: The insurer claimed Alzheimer’s didn’t qualify as a terminal illness because life expectancy was uncertain. We presented evidence showing the insured could no longer complete basic activities of daily living, forcing a payout.

  • $75,000 denial based on insufficient paperwork: The insured had Stage IV cancer, but the insurer insisted on additional reports from a second specialist. We argued that the original physician’s certification met the policy’s requirements. The claim was paid after intervention.

  • $90,000 withheld due to a missed waiting period: A policyholder was diagnosed and filed the claim 88 days into a 90-day waiting period. The insurer tried to deny based on two days. We demonstrated that the rider’s timing provision was ambiguously worded. The family received full benefits.

  • $50,000 denied due to treatment refusal: The insurer said the insured wasn’t eligible because they declined further chemotherapy. We showed that refusing painful or futile treatment does not disqualify someone from accelerated benefits. The claim was reversed.

Each of these examples illustrates how insurers use narrow definitions, technicalities, and policy gray areas to avoid paying accelerated benefits exactly when policyholders are most vulnerable.

How We Handle These Disputes—and Win

When insurers deny accelerated death benefit claims, we go beyond just reviewing the medical records. We analyze the exact policy language, compare it to industry standards, and evaluate whether the denial violates legal principles like contra proferentem, which requires courts to interpret ambiguities in favor of the insured.

In the AARP case, we also subpoenaed the insurer’s internal guidelines and past communications to show inconsistent practices. These strategies often expose weak legal grounds for denial and force the insurer to settle rather than face bad faith litigation.

We’ve handled accelerated benefit disputes involving cancer, stroke, ALS, dementia, organ failure, and severe mobility loss. Whether the issue is vague eligibility language, unreasonable documentation demands, or outright stalling, we know how to dismantle the insurer’s position and get the benefit paid.

If You’re Facing an Accelerated Benefit Denial, You Still Have Options

Insurers are quick to promote riders that offer early access to funds—but when it's time to pay, they often look for ways out. Whether it’s an AARP policy or another major carrier, don’t assume a denial is final. If your claim was delayed or denied under an accelerated death benefit rider, let our legal team review the policy and fight for what’s rightfully yours.

Do You Need a Life Insurance Lawyer?

Please contact us for a free legal review of your claim. Every submission is confidential and reviewed by an experienced life insurance attorney, not a call center or case manager. There is no fee unless we win.

We handle denied and delayed claims, beneficiary disputes, ERISA denials, interpleader lawsuits, and policy lapse cases.

  • By submitting, you agree to receive text messages from at the number provided, including those related to your inquiry, follow-ups, and review requests, via automated technology. Consent is not a condition of purchase. Msg & data rates may apply. Msg frequency may vary. Reply STOP to cancel or HELP for assistance. Acceptable Use Policy