Top
Life Insurance Interpleader

Life Insurance Interpleader Lawsuits

 

Christian Lassen Esq
Quoted in The Wall Street Journal
25 Years Experience Handling Life Insurance Disputes Nationwide

If you have been named as a defendant in a life insurance interpleader lawsuit, you are already involved in active litigation. This is not a routine insurance matter, and it is not an internal claim review. An interpleader is a lawsuit filed in court that places full control of the life insurance proceeds in the hands of a judge.

Once an interpleader action is filed, the insurance company no longer decides who gets paid. The outcome depends on legal filings, evidence, governing law, and how effectively each claimant asserts their position. Missing a deadline or failing to respond properly can result in permanent loss of the proceeds, even if you were the rightful beneficiary.

At Lassen Law Firm, we focus exclusively on life insurance disputes. Christian Lassen personally represents beneficiaries nationwide who have been sued in life insurance interpleader cases, from the moment the lawsuit is served through final resolution.

What a Life Insurance Interpleader Lawsuit Is

A life insurance interpleader lawsuit is filed when an insurance company claims it cannot safely determine who is legally entitled to the policy proceeds. Rather than paying the benefit, the insurer files a lawsuit, deposits the funds with the court, and names all potential claimants as defendants.

After the court accepts the deposited funds, the insurer typically asks to be dismissed from the case and discharged from further liability. If dismissal is granted, the insurance company exits the litigation entirely. The remaining defendants then litigate directly against one another to establish who has the superior legal right to the proceeds.

Although interpleader is presented as neutral, insurers often file these lawsuits even when reasonable claims handling could have resolved the dispute. Interpleader shifts the financial risk, litigation burden, and legal costs to the beneficiaries.

Where Life Insurance Interpleader Lawsuits Are Filed

Many life insurance interpleader lawsuits are filed in federal court. Insurers often prefer federal court because it provides uniform procedural rules, broader jurisdictional reach, and the ability to bring all claimants into a single forum.

Federal interpleader cases may proceed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 22 or under the federal interpleader statute at 28 U.S.C. § 1335. These two forms of interpleader have different jurisdictional requirements, service rules, and strategic consequences.

Some interpleader lawsuits are filed in state court, particularly when all parties reside in the same state or when federal jurisdiction is unavailable. Employer provided group life insurance policies are frequently governed by ERISA, which can override state law and impose a separate federal legal framework.

Determining the proper court and identifying the governing law is one of the most important early issues in any interpleader case.

Why Insurance Companies File Interpleader Lawsuits

Insurance companies file interpleader lawsuits to protect themselves from potential double liability. When an insurer believes that paying one claimant could expose it to a lawsuit from another, interpleader allows the insurer to avoid making a decision.

Common situations that trigger interpleader include divorce related beneficiary disputes, multiple beneficiary designation forms, alleged beneficiary changes shortly before death, claims of forgery or undue influence, competing claims between family members and estates, and conflicting employer records under group policies.

In practice, insurers frequently use interpleader defensively, prioritizing their own protection over prompt payment of benefits.

Federal Interpleader Law Explained

Federal Rule 22 allows an insurer to file an interpleader lawsuit when it faces competing claims that could result in multiple liability. Rule 22 does not create federal jurisdiction on its own, so the insurer must independently establish subject matter jurisdiction.

Statutory interpleader under 28 U.S.C. § 1335 provides an independent basis for federal jurisdiction. It requires only minimal diversity between claimants and permits nationwide service of process. Insurers proceeding under statutory interpleader must deposit the policy proceeds with the court.

The choice between Rule 22 and statutory interpleader affects venue, jurisdictional challenges, service of process, and litigation strategy. Understanding these distinctions is critical to defending an interpleader case effectively.

What Happens After an Interpleader Is Filed

After the lawsuit is filed, the insurer serves all named defendants with court papers. Each defendant must respond within strict deadlines set by court rules. Failure to respond can result in default judgment and permanent forfeiture of any claim to the proceeds.

The insurer typically files motions requesting permission to deposit the funds, discharge from liability, dismissal from the case, and reimbursement of attorney fees from the deposited proceeds.

Once the insurer is dismissed, the remaining defendants litigate entitlement to the funds through pleadings, discovery, motion practice, and, if necessary, trial. Courts may encourage settlement, but final resolution depends on evidence and applicable law.

How Courts Decide Who Receives the Proceeds

Courts decide interpleader cases based on documentary evidence, witness testimony, and governing legal principles. The analysis usually begins with the beneficiary designation on record with the insurer.

Courts examine whether the designation complies with policy requirements and applicable statutes. State laws that revoke beneficiary designations after divorce may apply, although exceptions are common and federal law may preempt state statutes entirely.

Courts also evaluate claims of forgery, undue influence, or lack of mental capacity. These allegations require proof and are not presumed to be true. When multiple beneficiary forms exist, courts determine which designation controls based on timing, execution, and compliance with policy requirements.

Typical Timeline of a Life Insurance Interpleader Case

Most interpleader cases follow a predictable sequence. The case begins with filing and service, followed by insurer motions for deposit and dismissal. After dismissal, the case proceeds through discovery, motion practice, and resolution by settlement or court decision.

Some cases resolve quickly when documentation is clear. Others involve extended litigation when intent, credibility, or legal interpretation is disputed.

Your Rights as a Named Beneficiary

As a named defendant in an interpleader lawsuit, you have the right to assert your claim to the proceeds, challenge competing claims, oppose improper attorney fee requests, conduct discovery, and seek summary judgment when appropriate.

Interpleader cases are adversarial litigation. Courts do not protect beneficiaries who fail to act. Those who miss deadlines or fail to present evidence often lose by default.

Representative Interpleader Case Example

In a recent interpleader case, a surviving child was named as a defendant after a former spouse asserted a competing claim. The insurer refused to pay and filed interpleader. By presenting beneficiary records, policy compliance evidence, and governing law, we established our client’s priority and secured full payment of the proceeds.

What To Do If You Are Served With an Interpleader Lawsuit

If you receive interpleader papers, do not ignore them. Preserve all documents, avoid communicating directly with competing claimants, and contact an experienced life insurance attorney immediately.

Early legal strategy often determines the outcome in an interpleader case.

See our Life Insurance Interpleader Lawsuit Fact Sheet

Free Case Evaluation Contact Us!

Written & Reviewed by Christian Lassen, Esq., Nationally recognized life insurance lawyer: 25 years experience, hundreds of millions recovered.  Quoted in The Wall Street Journal ( May 17, 2025).

Last reviewed: Jan 3, 2026 | Contact 800-330-2274

Frequently Asked Questions About Life Insurance Interpleaders

  • An interpleader is when an insurer asks a court to decide who should receive disputed life insurance proceeds.

  • To avoid liability when multiple people claim the same insurance benefits, protecting themselves from double payment lawsuits.

  • Yes. If you fail to respond, you can lose your claim to the insurance money by default.

  • The insurance company usually deposits the life insurance proceeds with the court, and court fees may be deducted from the funds before distribution. At Lassen Law Firm, we handle life insurance interpleader cases on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay no attorney’s fees unless we successfully recover proceeds for you.

  • Yes. If multiple parties prove partial entitlement, the court may divide proceeds among them.

  • Yes. Many interpleader cases are resolved through negotiation or mediation between competing claimants.

  • Courts review evidence, including prior forms, the insured’s intent, and legal presumptions to determine entitlement.

  • In some states, yes. Divorce can revoke a spouse's rights to proceeds unless reaffirmed afterward.

  • Possibly. If the insured failed to update the beneficiary designation after divorce, legal battles often arise.

  • Yes. If a beneficiary form is proven to be forged, it will be invalid, and rightful beneficiaries will prevail.

  • Yes. If the insured and beneficiary die close together, disputes over entitlement can trigger interpleader actions.

  • Yes. Group life policies through work often fall under ERISA, impacting how disputes are resolved in federal court.

  • Sometimes. If there’s a clear, uncontested beneficiary, interpleaders may be challenged as improper.

  • Timelines vary, but many resolve within 6 to 18 months depending on court schedules and complexity.

  • No. Life insurance proceeds are distributed according to the beneficiary designation, not the will.

  • Yes. Skilled attorneys can negotiate settlements faster and present strong evidence to secure rightful payment.

  • Possibly. In some cases, courts award fees to prevailing claimants, especially if bad faith is proven.

  • Each claimant must prove by a preponderance of evidence that they are entitled to the proceeds.

  • Failing to respond to the lawsuit promptly or trying to defend the case without legal representation.

Our Clients Speak Volumes

The Right Choice for Your Claim
    Denied for Prior Policy Cancellation
    “My husband didn’t list a prior policy cancellation, and they used that to deny our claim. Lassen Law proved it was irrelevant and unrelated to the cause of death. We received the benefit without a prolonged legal battle.”
    - Daniel S.

Why The Lassen Law Firm Is Different

  • Proven National Results

    With over two decades of exclusive focus on life insurance litigation, we’ve helped thousands of families recover wrongfully denied benefits. Our reputation for fast, strategic resolutions has made us a trusted national resource for complex claim disputes.

  • Recognized Expertise
    Perfect 10.0 Avvo rating endorsed by over 1,700 attorneys; life member of the Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum; ranked among the top 1 percent of lawyers nationally for life insurance litigation.
  • Client-First Advocacy
    No upfront fees: our contingency fee guarantee aligns our interests with yours; we provide personalized, compassionate representation from your initial consultation through resolution.
  • Media & Community Leadership
    Quoted in The Wall Street Journal and featured in leading legal publications; frequent speaker at national conferences; dedicated to charitable efforts supporting pediatric cancer care.

Do You Need a Life Insurance Lawyer?

Please contact us for a free legal review of your claim. Every submission is confidential and reviewed by an experienced life insurance attorney, not a call center or case manager. There is no fee unless we win.

We handle denied and delayed claims, beneficiary disputes, ERISA denials, interpleader lawsuits, and policy lapse cases.

  • By submitting, you agree to receive text messages from at the number provided, including those related to your inquiry, follow-ups, and review requests, via automated technology. Consent is not a condition of purchase. Msg & data rates may apply. Msg frequency may vary. Reply STOP to cancel or HELP for assistance. Acceptable Use Policy